Transcript: Here’s everything Sean Spicer said about marijuana
Q: Thanks, Sean. Roby Brock with Talk Business & Politics here in Arkansas, the home of the rowdiest town halls in the nation.
I have a question on medical marijuana. Our state voters passed a medical marijuana amendment in November. Now we’re in conflict with federal law, as many other states are. The Obama administration kind of chose not to strictly enforce those federal marijuana laws. My question to you is: With Jeff Sessions over at the Department of Justice as AG, what’s going to be the Trump administration’s position on marijuana legalization where it’s in a state-federal conflict like this?
Related stories
- Maine police group asks for clarification from Trump on marijuana rules
- Trump won’t “turn his back” on Colorado pot laws, GOP lawmaker says
- Colorado gov on “Meet the Press”: It’s unclear whether Trump administration could stop legal marijuana
- Marijuana industry, angered by White House reversal, speaks out
- Nevada continuing to plan for July marijuana sales, despite federal crackdown warning
MR. SPICER: Thanks, Roby. There’s two distinct issues here: medical marijuana and recreational marijuana.
I think medical marijuana, I’ve said before that the President understands the pain and suffering that many people go through who are facing especially terminal diseases and the comfort that some of these drugs, including medical marijuana, can bring to them. And that’s one that Congress, through a rider in 2011 — looking for a little help — I think put in an appropriations bill saying the Department of Justice wouldn’t be funded to go after those folks.
There is a big difference between that and recreational marijuana. And I think that when you see something like the opioid addiction crisis blossoming in so many states around this country, the last thing that we should be doing is encouraging people. There is still a federal law that we need to abide by in terms of the medical — when it comes to recreational marijuana and other drugs of that nature.
So I think there’s a big difference between medical marijuana, which states have a — the states where it’s allowed, in accordance with the appropriations rider, have set forth a process to administer and regulate that usage, versus recreational marijuana. That’s a very, very different subject.
Shannon.
Q: What does that mean in terms of policy? A follow-up, Sean. What does that mean in terms of policy?
MR. SPICER: Shannon. Glenn, this isn’t a TV program. We’re going to —
Q: What is the Justice Department going to do?
MR. SPICER: Okay, you don’t get to just yell out questions. We’re going to raise our hands like big boys and girls.
Q: Why don’t you answer the question, though?
MR. SPICER: Because it’s not your job to just yell out questions.
Shannon, please go.
Q: Okay. Well, first, on the manufacturing summit, was the AFL-CIO invited? And then, yeah, I did want to follow up on this medical marijuana question. So is the federal government then going to take some sort of action around this recreational marijuana in some of these states?
Related stories
- Retired California minister arrested in Texas for carrying personal supply of medical marijuana
- Trump administration puts recreational marijuana in crosshairs
- Medical marijuana bill moves ahead in South Carolina
- Arkansas one step closer to implementation of medical marijuana
MR. SPICER: Well, I think that’s a question for the Department of Justice. I do believe that you’ll see greater enforcement of it. Because again, there’s a big difference between the medical use which Congress has, through an appropriations rider in 2014, made very clear what their intent was in terms of how the Department of Justice would handle that issue. That’s very different than the recreational use, which is something the Department of Justice I think will be further looking into.
