57597f21ad-826x470

Grammar error endangers South Dakota marijuana ballot initiative

57597f21ad.jpeg

Published: Aug 1, 2017, 1:55 pm • Updated: Aug 1, 2017, 2:05 pm

By The Associated Press

SIOUX FALLS, S.D. — A writing error could cost a ballot measure campaign its chance to legalize recreational marijuana in South Dakota next year.

Cannabis advocacy group New Approach South Dakota has been collecting signatures for months in support of a proposed ballot measure meant to legalize small amounts of marijuana, the Argus Leader reported.

But the state’s interpretation of the wording means it would only legalize marijuana paraphernalia, not the drug itself. Nonpartisan analysts with the Legislative Research Council said that one sentence in the 11-page proposal undermines the legalization effort.

The section legalizing marijuana paraphernalia addresses the law of “the state or the subdivision” (cities or counties), but the section legalizing marijuana itself only addresses the law of the subdivision and doesn’t include “the state or.”

This means the measure wouldn’t affect the state’s law banning recreational marijuana, should the measure make it to the ballot next year.

New Approach Director Melissa Mentele said she wrote the measure based on existing statute and that the problem can be fixed later by the courts or the Legislature.

Related stories

  • South Dakota medical marijuana advocate running for Congress
  • Rapper Chief Keef faces felony charge for edible found in carry-on at South Dakota airport
  • South Dakota jury acquits Colorado marijuana consultant of all charges in weed resort case
  • Trial for South Dakota Sioux tribe weed resort consultant enters final day
  • S.D. Sioux tribe’s cannabis resort consultant faces trial on drug charges

“There is a fix for it, so I’m not concerned about it at all,” Mentele said. “It’s just a typo. It’s one person’s perception of grammar versus another’s.”

Legislative Research Council Director Jason Hancock said supporters of the measure could submit an amended proposal, but that would void all existing ballot measure signatures.

“They’re going to have to start over for gathering signatures,” he said.

A new proposal could derail efforts to get the question on the ballot as the attorney general’s office could take up to 90 days to publish an explanation.

Jesse Kelley, an attorney with the Marijuana Policy Project helping Mentele’s campaign, said that the measure was written to allow for local control in deciding how to implement the decriminalization of marijuana possession, sale and use. And the group has succeeded in states where similar measures have been challenged in court, she said.

“This is not a new issue that the South Dakota group is facing,” she said. “Opponents will go to great lengths to defeat these proposals.”

Kelley said her group will continue to work with Mentele to pass the proposal and amend it once approved.

Supporters would have to collect nearly 14,000 valid signatures by November in order to get the measure on the 2018 ballot.

Information from: Argus Leader

Topics: ballot initiative, Paraphernalia, recreational, South Dakota, South Dakota ballot measure

Related Posts